I realize that anecdotal evidence doesn't really mean much for an encyclopedia, but I'd still like to share. I asked my friend who lives in Canada whether he ever calls himself an American as a resident of North America, and whether he would refer to people in Mexico or South America as Americans. He replied no, and said that he refers to himself as a Canadian, United States citizens as Americans, Mexico citizens as Mexicans, etc. He doesn't know anyone else who does. It seems to me that an overwhelming majority of people I've come into contact with, as well as the media I've been exposed to refer to U.S. citizens as Americans, preferring to identify people by their nation rather than continent. While you could refer to people from Europe as Europeans, it would just promote confusion if you identified people from the Americas and Americans. While I personally think that one nation, (even if it is my own) should not hog the name of two entire continents, I see it as the same situation as Pennsylvania Dutch (Pennsylvania German?)
We should name our articles as the majority of the world expects to find them, not as whatever is academically or linguistically correct.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
cprompt@optonline.net wrote:
I realize that anecdotal evidence doesn't really mean much for an encyclopedia, but I'd still like to share. I asked my friend who lives in Canada whether he ever calls himself an American as a resident of North America, and whether he would refer to people in Mexico or South America as Americans. He replied no, and said that he refers to himself as a Canadian, United States citizens as Americans, Mexico citizens as Mexicans, etc. He doesn't know anyone else who does. It seems to me that an overwhelming majority of people I've come into contact with, as well as the media I've been exposed to refer to U.S. citizens as Americans, preferring to identify people by their nation rather than continent. While you could refer to people from Europe as Europeans, it would just promote confusion if you identified people from the Americas and Americans. While I personally think that one nation, (even if it is my own) should not hog the name of two entire continents, I see it as the same situation as Pennsylvania Dutch (Pennsylvania German?)
There is no doubt that "people of the United States" is less controversial, but those of us in the other Americas will certainly condescend to permit them to use the term, "American", providing that we be spared from being mistaken for them, for certainly the citizens of all the other countries of the Americas have available adjectives that would enable them to be distinguished from the United States.
Amerigo Vespucci's name was first suggested for naming the continent in 1504, i.e.there were 272 years between this and 1776 while there have been only 227 since. In about 1890 Secretary of State James G. Blaine was actively promoting the renaming of the United States to commemorate Christopher Columbus (having failed to recognize that the citizens of New Granada had already claimed this honour). The movement obviously failed, despite the fact that at that time Vespucci was being widely but wrongfully accused as a thief who had stolen the credit for Columbus's discoveries. Vespucci was a businessman seeking to exploit and bring home the riches of foreign lands, and as a Florentine was in a better position to be marketed than the Genoan who was alleged to have introduced syphilis to Europe. This all suggests that the United States of America is suitably named. Perhaps we could initiate a movement to rename the two continents.
Eclecticology