Hello, Out of curiosity, I have followed the threads to this one of a last site I will research today
What are you? Are you self-appointed? Why is the word "bias" chosen explain your existence and goal? Are you not attempting to do the very thing you are attempting to re-write? We all have an opinion, so why the Hawaiian "wiki-wiki" word base to everything that is your opinion? This seems like another attempt to re-write history, is it? To what goal/purpose? It seems you are using the thing you are trying to describe that you are/do, to describe what you are/do?
Why such confusion? Are you not satisfied with things the way they have been for hundreds of years, even to all of our advantages, or are you attempting to simply impose your own points of view into society to justify something that has not been accepted? Have you given serious thought that there is valid reason why things originated this way? Can you add one day to your own life, for example, by changing how things are into something you wished they were?
It's a novel idea but going where? There is nothing Nu/New about NewAge nor is there anything of true value that's "new under the sun". ..i.e., ."all is vanity".
Is this witchcraft? Would you admit it if it were? What is witchcraft? Rebellion to how things were designed to be by the Designer Himself, who never changes. Have you believed a lie?Can the clay tell the Potter what to make?
Just blogging around, wondering why these words had to replace the perfectly good/valid word "looking". Seems like some sort of nupig-latin? Yes, each generation wants to contribute and make it's mark, but most things don't need reinventing, regardless of what Mr. Clinton thinks. Wasn't there a movie back in the 50's called ,"The Blog"? or was it "The Blog that Ate New York"? Has this just oozed out in need of a place to puddle? LOL.(incidentally, my sister's nick-name is "lol", our never dreaming it too would become a NU thang 4 U.)
There needs to be a separate topic called, "Personal Relationship", in the "Religious" section before you try to wipe it out, too, leaving no choices but yours to consider.
This whole idea of yours is most offensive to those of us who should have done the same sort of thing to your generation, right after you learned what works, what things are called, the who, where, and whens.
Actually, I apologize! Perhaps we did similar things? I remember my generation following our ancestors in teaching infants to speak as early as possible, encouraging them to speak more with each year, and to think of questions/topics/imagination.
Then we supported their teachers who required that they be totally silent, to sit perfectly still in a particular posture, to speak only when spoken to, to be monitored, to leave the room only when an emergency/breaks, to write rather than to speak, to listen twice as much as they speak, to get permission to speak, and to accept the status quo, with few if any, questions.
This discipline failed, because instead it produced generations of their confusion beginning at an early age, intellectual imbalance, rebellion to parents/teachers, bitter challenges and their questioning/irrelevant topics/improper fantasies, outspoken at inappropriate times, continual disruption, anxiety, attention deficit disorders, hyperactivity/hypersensitivity, unrest, inattention to posture/rules, underground newspapers full of their anger/hatred/rage, total disregard for the laws of their parents/forefathers, need for attention at all costs, lack of respect for elders, foul speech regardless of consequence because it was their "constitutional right", refusing to seek permission/acknowledge authority, refusal to comply/cooperate, scandalizing the society with on-going questions/needs for change. In other words, it produced a different type of discipline, not of self, but of self-imposed discipline upon others....sort of what we attempted to do, but for the opposite reasons.
It was our goal to give our offspring momentum, impetus, a refinement of what we had received, a boost toward a higher goal, integrity, appreciation for self-discipline and what it had produced in the past for our ancestors, opportunity to advance farther, focus on the future and what they could achieve with such guidance/application, greater financial support, goods and services they needed, ancestral values/morals support, stability, the American Dream on a godly foundation of basic goodness and the Golden Rule, regardless of how inept each of us might have been.
Once we are gone, the powers that be can continue in their rebellion, rid themselves of all signs of us and our belief in the God of Heaven and Earth and all the hosts therein, correct our mistakes, mock and entertain themselves by turning good to evil, calling evil good, sit on the seat of the scorners, reinvent a more politically correct discipline, and not look back, plowing head on into what lies ahead, in mass to what they have created, right through the wide gates, totally missing the narrow path we tried to stay and walk upon, plunging into what the future they have chosen holds, in their blogstorm, with tablets of wikimedium, and nupediae, thumbing their upturned noses and pointed fingers at the fools who tried to hold their hands and lead them on the same path but loved them enough to let them fall, in hopes that they would dust themselves off and begin again?
No stone thrown. Lyndagayle62
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Lyndagayle62@aol.com stated for the record:
Hello, Out of curiosity, I have followed the threads to this one of a last site I will research today
What are you? Are you self-appointed? Why is the word "bias" chosen explain your existence and goal?
...
No stone thrown. Lyndagayle62
I hope you brought enough of those drugs to share.
- -- Sean Barrett | If you insist upon discussing my fiasco, I sean@epoptic.com | shall forthwith go home. --Nadreck of Palain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Sean Barrett wrote:
Lyndagayle62@aol.com stated for the record:
Hello, Out of curiosity, I have followed the threads to this one of a last site I will research today
What are you? Are you self-appointed? Why is the word "bias" chosen explain your existence and goal?
...
No stone thrown. Lyndagayle62
I hope you brought enough of those drugs to share.
Lawn clippings available at [[Astroturfing]], I think...
- -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
I'm sorry, but I don't get what you're talking about. Can you please specify which article you are trying to change and what you're trying to do?
What are you? Are you self-appointed? Why is the word "bias" chosen explain your existence and goal? Are you not attempting to do the very thing you are attempting to re-write? We all have an opinion, so why the Hawaiian "wiki-wiki" word base to everything that is your opinion? This seems like another attempt to re-write history, is it? To what goal/purpose? It seems you are using the thing you are trying to describe that you are/do, to describe what you are/do?
Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia written by its users which strives to be neutral. Of course, it's not going to happen overnight and there's always going to be people who try to push in their views, but that's not accepted by most people in the community of dedicated users. "Wiki" was chosen for its sound and the idea that with a lot of people chipping in you could get great articles "quickly" which is essentially what wiki-wiki means.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Replies_to_common_objections
--Mgm