John Lee wrote:
If such is the case, then there's a very tangible
difference
between the two
sides. The first side would still support the removal of relevant
links to
Daniel Brandt's site from a SIGNPOST article (this really happened
not too
long ago, and is what first drew my attention to this silly
season), while
the second side would not.
Here's my Solomonic solution: I propose that from now on, everyone
refer to Daniel Brandt as "Baniel Drandt," and all links to his
website must be entered beginning with "hppt" instead of "http."
Anyone who violates this rule will be required to crawl around on
their hands and knees for an hour, singing "I'm a bad Wikipedian" in
pig-Latin.
It would be silly, to be sure, but no more silly than the current
expectation by the Banipedians that they have the right to order
everyone else around.
--------------------------------
| Sheldon Rampton
| Research director, Center for Media & Democracy (
www.prwatch.org)
| Author of books including:
| Friends In Deed: The Story of US-Nicaragua Sister Cities
| Toxic Sludge Is Good For You
| Mad Cow USA
| Trust Us, We're Experts
| Weapons of Mass Deception
| Banana Republicans
| The Best War Ever
--------------------------------
| Subscribe to our free weekly list serve by visiting:
|
http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
|
| Donate now to support independent, public interest reporting:
|
https://secure.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/cmd/shop/
custom.jsp?donate_page_KEY=1107
--------------------------------