And also I have already discussed ENOUGH on the discussion pages for Steve Nash and nobody can reply to what I wrote. If I DISCUSS it and nobody can reply or make a good reason why not to include something IN MY OPINION, then it stays right??? These are all FACTS BTW THAT I POST THAT RELATE. TOO MUCH BIAS ON SOME OF THESE SPORTS PAGES.
--- wikien-l-request@Wikipedia.org wrote:
Send WikiEN-l mailing list submissions to wikien-l@Wikipedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to wikien-l-request@Wikipedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at wikien-l-owner@Wikipedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of WikiEN-l digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Deletion before discussion (Drini drini)
- Re: Deletion before discussion (Katie
(keitei)) 3. Re: Message: 4 William M. Connolley- He wrote about the edit (Earthhope Action Network) 4. Re: Message: 4 William M. Connolley- He wrote about theedit (Peter Mackay) 5. Re: CSD T1 (geni) 6. Re: Deletion before discussion (geni) 7. Re: Darren@nocuffs (Guy Chapman aka JzG) 8. Re: 7. Re: Zero information is preferred to misleading or false (Guy Chapman aka JzG) 9. Re: 7. Re: Zero information is preferred to (Earthhope Action Network)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:31:43 -0500 From: "Drini drini" wpdrini@gmail.com Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Deletion before discussion To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@wikipedia.org Message-ID:
ca57470e0605171931t2e85f199i8cf010dc92e91d0f@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
EXCEPT... that Wikipedia is not your personal blog nor a free webhost (**Official policy** at [[WP:NOT]] ). Userspace IS SUPPOSED to be relted to your wikipedia work, not to post pictures of your family. If you misuse it, don't cry about it later. And , do you really think vandals will care about the copyright? they WILL get the pictures and post them anyway.
Wikipedia IS AN ENCYCLOPEDIA not an scrapbook, but there's plenty of sites where you can put your family pictures if you like
On 5/17/06, Rob gamaliel8@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/17/06, Ben McIlwain cydeweys@gmail.com
wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
On 5/17/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
I'm afaraid we don't allow "with permission"
images.
Even in userspace? Was that an intentional
decision? Does it apply
when
people upload photos of themselves?
/Especially/ in userspace (in articles you can
at least make a case for
fair use). And people had better be uploading
those pictures of
themselves under free licenses such as GFDL, CC,
or PD.
Why?
If I ever wanted to put a pic of myself or my kids
on WP, I wouldn't
want to release it under a free (or free-ish)
license so every troll I
block for vandalism could put my family on their
webpage. Of course,
they can already do that, but not legally, for
what it's worth.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Message: 2 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:54:34 -0400 From: "Katie (keitei)" katiefromuncyc@gmail.com Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Deletion before discussion To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@wikipedia.org Message-ID:
bf1babc10605171954w501a69a9ged8585c03d10a0f5@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 5/17/06, Philip Welch wikipedia@philwelch.net wrote:
On May 17, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
Even in userspace? Was that an intentional
decision? Does it apply
when people upload photos of themselves?
People should release photos of themselves under
GFDL or CC-BY-SA if
they upload them. If they aren't the original
photographer they
should not upload other people's copyrighted
photos to Wikipedia.
-- Philip L. Welch http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch
The image this thread was originally about did have a CC license. It's technically a free license, just not THE free license. CC-BY-NC-SA should be allowed in userpages, in my opinion.
-- -Katie http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Keitei http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keitei
Message: 3 Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 00:06:57 -0400 From: "Earthhope Action Network" contact@earthhopenetwork.net Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Message: 4 William M. Connolley- He wrote about the edit To: wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Message-ID:
bf12aac60605172106o354a1ba9j9a95040cb8c70573@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: [WikiEN-l] William M. Connolley- He wrote
about the
edit wars butit makes no sense!!!!!!!!!
Why? Because the other wikipedians are vandalizing
and
deleting ALL THE FACTS I WRITE that completely
RELATE
TO THE SUBJECT. I did not do anything wrong this
time,
but he is upset by the info I post. I am steaming about this. He is a horrible admin.
You'll find any number of other editors who agree with you, but this isn't the place to discuss it. As advised, use the article discussion page to talk about it in a civil and constructive manner. If you still cannot get justice*, come back with a couple of good examples and ask for help. Don't expect much if you are being a self-righteous pest.
Pete, speaking from experience
*Justice is a nebulous concept here. Wikipedia is just a website. It's not a
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com