Right. Arbcom members are in a position where they are more likely than most to receive information pertaining to real crimes. They should definitely contact the authorities when something like that comes their way.
I recognize that Arbcom members are volunteers, and not experts, but they definitely should not be quietly sitting on threats of violence. I don't know if that's what happened, but if it did, they need to recognize that it was the wrong thing to do.
Victims of crimes, particularly ones involving intimidation, can't always think rationally about the problem, so putting it off on them is a bad idea.
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:11:39 -0800 From: "Todd Allen"
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 25/02/2008, Matt Jacobs wrote:
I do wonder why this apparently hasn't been reported yet. If an arbcom member does have knowledge of this, they should know to forward it to the authorities. Keeping it to themselves is the last thing they should do, because these kinds of idiots (weak morons trying to make themselves feel strong by threatening someone they consider weaker) thrive on secrecy.
It's not up to ArbCom to report it, it's up to the person being threatened.
Anyone who knows or has good reason to believe a crime has occurred can (and in theory is obligated to) report it to the police, not just its victim.
-- Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.
Victims of crimes, particularly ones involving intimidation, can't always think rationally about the problem, so putting it off on them is a bad idea.
True, but if the victim isn't willing to talk to the police, what are the police meant to do?
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
Victims of crimes, particularly ones involving intimidation, can't always think rationally about the problem, so putting it off on them is a bad idea.
True, but if the victim isn't willing to talk to the police, what are the police meant to do?
And indeed, when the victim and perpetrator both anonymous pseudonyms that reside in countries unknown, you'll likely be hard pressed to get any police help.
WilyD
FWIW,
On November 26, I received the following message from "anonymous anonymous" cantlieanymore@gmail.com:
<quote>ive thought it over long and hard. whats gone on just hasnt been right. i wanted to give you a heads up so you could can tell first. if you dont tell i will.</quote>
Didn't feel threatened however, but a bit confused. Has anyone else ever seen that address?
Adrian
Looks like spam to me. Who knows? Maybe just ... anything (random nutjob comes to mind...).
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Adrian (User:Dorftrottel) aldebaer@googlemail.com wrote:
FWIW,
On November 26, I received the following message from "anonymous anonymous" cantlieanymore@gmail.com:
<quote>ive thought it over long and hard. whats gone on just hasnt been right. i wanted to give you a heads up so you could can tell first. if you dont tell i will.</quote>
Didn't feel threatened however, but a bit confused. Has anyone else ever seen that address?
Adrian
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l