Was there anything official from the Arbitration Committee about Plautus satire?
Unless anyone feels there's an "emergency" reason to suspend Plautus satire's editing privileges, I feel I should "unban" his user account. I'll wait an hour or so, and if there are no replies, I think I ought to click the unban button.
Ed Poor, aka Uncle Ed
At 05:09 PM 2/17/2004 +0000, Charles Matthews wrote:
Unless anyone feels there's an "emergency" reason to suspend Plautus
satire's editing privileges, I feel I should "unban" his user account.
I haven't followed the history of this; but definitely didn't need the 18 abusive emails he sent to me personally.
I feel left out, only two personalized profanity-laden diatribes were sent to me. Must be because I'm not editing enough, I need to raise my Wikiprofile more. To work!
Was there anything official from the Arbitration Committee about Plautus satire?
The Arbitration Committee has not discussed Plautus at all. Until this recent spamming, I'd never heard of him.
Unless anyone feels there's an "emergency" reason to suspend Plautus satire's editing privileges, I feel I should "unban" his user account. I'll wait an hour or so, and if there are no replies, I think I ought to click the unban button.
I support your unbanning of him. I see no emergency; the banning looks like vigilante action to me.
Poor, Edmund W wrote:
Was there anything official from the Arbitration Committee about Plautus satire?
FWIW, all official arbitration committee action, including both reviewing a case and making a decision on it, will be documented at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration]] (in the future we expect the decisions to be explained in more depth as well). So far the MNH matter is the only one that's been considered and decided; there are currently no pending matters.
-Mark