On 7 Feb 2006 at 22:19, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/7/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently no one is going to mention semi-protection.
I think that was more softwear rather than policy.
Softwear? Is that something like underwear?
On 2/8/06, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 7 Feb 2006 at 22:19, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/7/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently no one is going to mention semi-protection.
I think that was more softwear rather than policy.
Softwear? Is that something like underwear?
-- == Dan ==
Running everything a put into the article namespace through a spellcheacker take long enough.
-- geni
On 2/8/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Running everything a put into the article namespace through a spellcheacker take long enough.
You use Gmail. Gmail has a spell check facility. Please use it, we'd all appreciate it!
-- Sam
Sam Korn wrote:
On 2/8/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Running everything a put into the article namespace through a spellcheacker take long enough.
You use Gmail. Gmail has a spell check facility. Please use it, we'd all appreciate it!
Like everything else in Gmail, I suspect it doesn't work as it's supposed to...
On 2/8/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
You use Gmail. Gmail has a spell check facility. Please use it, we'd all appreciate it!
Nah, save the beautiful prose for Wikipedia articles.
Steve