Brian0918 claims that I was blocked because of multiple vandalisms. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=1...
According to policy, any good faith-effort to improve the encylcopedia is not considered vandalism. If you look at my edits, they were each an attempt to clean up information about Michael Behe, the Discovery Institute, and the Intelligent Design movement, which is often confused and misrepresented. Edits were made to delete information that was unsubstantiated and that was dismissive of these views without warrant.
Nothing I did could be considered vandalism, and I request this block be reconsidered and reviewed.
Samuel Meyer wrote:
According to policy, any good faith-effort to improve the encylcopedia is not considered vandalism.
Yes, but unfortunately good-faith edits aren't automatically marked as such, you see. You've removed stuff, without an edit summary, and I'm sure you'll understand how this can very easily be interpreted as vandalism.
Edits were made to delete information that was unsubstantiated and that was dismissive of these views without warrant.
You can move unsubstantiated information to the Talk page and request a source. Ideally, people putting the information back in should provide a source for it. If they just put it back without a source, contact them on their User talk page to talk it over.
Timwi