In a message dated 3/8/2007 7:59:38 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, cunctator@gmail.com writes:

I'm not saying this has to be done *instead* of other policies, though my personal opinion is that Wikipedia is best served if people are either anonymous & claims about their credentials are recognized to be caveat emptor or people are publicly identified.

I think it's generally a good idea that we eat our own dog food.

There's not enough accountability then. Someone who gives his name's going to take things more seriously than someone who doesn't, and this atmosphere of edit for the sake of it, where it even ruins an article, has major flaws.

Vincent <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.