In todays Guardian -- a major British broadsheet newspaper -- Notes and Queries column (the version published on dead trees, rather than the website) a correspondent cites www.wikipedia.org as an authority on various Dukes Of Edinburgh. Might draw a little traffic.
Kudos to http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_of_Edinburgh
Gareth Owen wrote:
In todays Guardian -- a major British broadsheet newspaper -- Notes and Queries column (the version published on dead trees, rather than the website) a correspondent cites www.wikipedia.org as an authority on various Dukes Of Edinburgh. Might draw a little traffic.
What's interesting about this is what it tells us about the kinds of article that draw traffic. I have no doubt that the information mentioned there about the Dukes of Edinburgh is available on other sites, but we have it organized in one spot in a comprehensive way. Certain of our "List of" articles may seem trite and unimaginative, but I believe that they have an attraction for people who want this kind of summary information in one place, rather than going on an internet wild-goose chase. These chases are frustrating enough for experienced searchers, and impossible for others.
Ec