http://www.apcmag.com/7924/the_future_of_the_linux_kernel_and_what_it_tells_...
Applying lesson #4 will doubtless be interesting.
- d.
Goodness yes :) Anthony
User:AGK en.wikipedia.org
On 30/01/2008, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.apcmag.com/7924/the_future_of_the_linux_kernel_and_what_it_tells_...
Applying lesson #4 will doubtless be interesting.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On 1/31/08, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.apcmag.com/7924/the_future_of_the_linux_kernel_and_what_it_tells_...
Applying lesson #4 will doubtless be interesting.
While the majority of kernel contributors (17%) aren't paid by an
obvious employer
They have an interesting definition of "majority". They probably mean something like "the biggest employer of kernal contributors is 'no one'" but it's a pretty meaningless figure. The reverse is more interesting though: 83% of their contributors are essentially paid to do it.
Steve
On 01/02/2008, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/31/08, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.apcmag.com/7924/the_future_of_the_linux_kernel_and_what_it_tells_...
Applying lesson #4 will doubtless be interesting.
While the majority of kernel contributors (17%) aren't paid by an
obvious employer
They have an interesting definition of "majority".
The same one as many politicians, who use "majority" when they mean "plurality".