Caroline,
I agree that I was wrong to apply a unilateral ban. But what else can we do with someone who censors articles, and refuses to explain himself?
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Suicide_bombing&action=histor y
I don't think that "rv for already stated reasons" is a sufficient explanation, so I protected the article.
Ed Poor
Tim Starling has now banned both Wik and Anthony DiPierro for getting into a revert war on the Votes for Deletion page, which cause the page to be protected and unusable.
RickK
"Poor, Edmund W" Edmund.W.Poor@abc.com wrote: Caroline,
I agree that I was wrong to apply a unilateral ban. But what else can we do with someone who censors articles, and refuses to explain himself?
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Suicide_bombing&action=histor y
I don't think that "rv for already stated reasons" is a sufficient explanation, so I protected the article.
Ed Poor _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online