On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:29:17 (GMT), jfdwolff@doctors.org.uk jfdwolff@doctors.org.uk wrote:

I don't want to get involved with this discussion, and like others on the various mailing lists that these (sometimes childish) arguements have ensued I have chosen to ignore the many threads for quite sometime. I would like to respectfully ask that these conversations please be moved off list to the appropriate pages. May I suggest: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Profanity http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Should_Wikipedia_Use_Profanity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_disclaimer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Graphic_and_potentially_disturbing_im... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_censorship http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_use_policy

Also, concerning the following statement:

I find links to porn sites, especially with a clear disclaimer, much

less troublesome than images that pop up without warning.

JFW

I have never had any issue with images poping up on Wikipedia, and certainly not without warning. We http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_disclaimer which explicitly says "Wikipedia contains many different images, some of which are considered objectionable or offensive by some readers." I'd consider that a reasonable warning. Anyway, this is not my main issue. Please move these conversations off list. Thank You!