My attempt to restore the head of the VFU page to correctly quote the undeletion policy has been reverted. I have edited the "purpose" section of the VFU page to state solely that the authoritative description of the purpose of the page is in the undeletion policy.
What does one do in a case where some editors insist on replacing a correct citation of official policy with a form of words which is directly contrary to it?
On 9/16/05, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
What does one do in a case where some editors insist on replacing a correct citation of official policy with a form of words which is directly contrary to it?
Discuss on talk pages. If that doesn't work, try an RFC. This certainly seems a good reason to use one to me: it is of wide community interest et c.
Sam