On 6/8/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
On 8 Jun 2007 at 09:05:41 -0400, jayjg
<jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How odd. A userid was created yesterday which
nominated the Wikitruth
article for deletion, based on BADSITES, and a bunch of
none-too-convincing arguments. It's about the most obvious example of
a straw man nomination I've seen in a while; I hope I am not accused
of trying to revise history by saying that.
But, it's funny that the same "none-too-convincing arguments" and
contentious behavior, when MONGO did it, was perfectly all right.
When I complained about his behavior on AN/I, I was the one who got
slapped for it, and threatened with blocking for "stalking" MONGO (by
reverting his edits that I considered vandalism). Once again, he got
off totally scot free, without so much as a slap on the wrist. Once
again, it's shown that there's an "untouchable" caste here, a clique
that has a free pass to do what it wishes, censor what it wishes, be
uncivil to whomever it wishes, and the admins will always side with
them and against whomever tries to hold them to account for their
behavior. Some animals are more equal than others.
How can I put this, Dan; your constant railing about an "untouchable"
cabal sounds, um, kinda crazy. Perhaps even more seriously, it's
boring. People don't read rants.