On 28 Aug 2007 at 08:43:52 -0500, "Armed Blowfish" diodontida.armata@googlemail.com wrote:
Like I said, Wikipaedia is also an attack site. David hardly started that. It's ingrained in the culture.
So we shouldn't be linking to it, I guess.
Anyway... say what you want about Wikipedia, but please at least spell its name right!
On 28/08/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 28 Aug 2007 at 08:43:52 -0500, "Armed Blowfish" diodontida.armata@googlemail.com wrote:
Like I said, Wikipaedia is also an attack site. David hardly started that. It's ingrained in the culture.
So we shouldn't be linking to it, I guess.
Or perhaps Wikipaedia could stop being an attack site? For example, let OTRS do its job without fighting them every step of the way?
Anyway... say what you want about Wikipedia, but please at least spell its name right!
Spelling varies by language / dialect. Look at the logo pictures of Wikipaedia in various languages.
-- == Dan == Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
On 8/29/07, Armed Blowfish diodontida.armata@googlemail.com wrote:
On 28/08/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 28 Aug 2007 at 08:43:52 -0500, "Armed Blowfish" diodontida.armata@googlemail.com wrote:
Like I said, Wikipaedia is also an attack site. David hardly started that. It's ingrained in the culture.
So we shouldn't be linking to it, I guess.
Or perhaps Wikipaedia could stop being an attack site? For example, let OTRS do its job without fighting them every step of the way?
I think you have misunderstood what OTRS is for.