WJhonson(a)aol.com says this does not meet WP:RS. I *meant* to fail WP:RS. This reminds me that not everyone really perceives jokes, even when, at the point of this, there doesn't seem to be any possibility of getting a reliable source. I think you could link to it from WP:BLP and WP:RS, and the point would be lost on only the daft. <ref>Fiction</ref> should be in the text for clarity where Jack writes his evidence, just because I am specifically addressing newbies. I haven't really figured out what a quack-head is. Any opinions? Somebody obsessed with comparing themselves to doctors without a degree?