In a message dated 6/18/2008 1:59:31 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, sam.blacketer@googlemail.com writes:

I think the greater danger would be the assumption that administrators are bound to act irresponsibly. >>

-------------------------------------------- You set up a false dichotomy. It is not that we have a choice between "all administrators act responsibly" and "all administrators are irresponsibly".

That is not the situation. The true situation is that "some administrators sometimes act irresponsibly."

To require a reversal of an arbitrary action *only* on the consensus of the community essentially encourages some admins to act irresponsibly even more often, because they know their actions will be even less often reviewed since the procedure to so-do is now beauracratic. That is the wrong message to be sending.

Will Johnson

**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)