RK,
Perhaps I was less than clear. My offer to un-ban you was CONDITIONAL on your seeking out my advice and following it. My promise was (and still is):
* No one who seeks out my help and follows my advice ever comes to harm.
I have had no messages from you, either in private e-mail, the Wikipedia mailing list, or the Wikipedia website. I can't help someone who refuses to communicate.
Now I must ask you the same question I asked Lir:
* What advice of mine did you ever follow?
Sadly,
Ed Poor
Just to inject a bit of legal formalism here, if RK had sought and followed Ed's advice, and the arbcom banned him anyway, and Ed unblocked him anyway, Ed would be in the wrong. We have worked very hard to put into place the "rule of law" as opposed to arbitrary individual bans/unbans, and I intend to vigorously defend that.
--Jimbo
Poor, Edmund W wrote:
RK,
Perhaps I was less than clear. My offer to un-ban you was CONDITIONAL on your seeking out my advice and following it. My promise was (and still is):
- No one who seeks out my help and follows my advice ever comes to harm.
I have had no messages from you, either in private e-mail, the Wikipedia mailing list, or the Wikipedia website. I can't help someone who refuses to communicate.
Now I must ask you the same question I asked Lir:
- What advice of mine did you ever follow?
Sadly,
Ed Poor _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l