In a message dated 8/13/2008 3:49:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, newyorkbrad@gmail.com writes:

Although we have not adopted a "BLP opt-out policy," I do not understand why a user would consider it a significant priority to re-create an article containing predominently negative coverage about an, at best, highly-borderline-notable individual who has expressed extreme resentment regarding the existence of such article.>>

------------------------------------------ I didn't say it was a "significant priority" of mine. However two points, whether or not its "predominently negative", and whether or not she has "expressed extreme resentment" should have no impact on our mission, in my opinion.

If someone is notable, then we should have an article. And where the chips fall is that person's own fault, not ours. As long as we present the sources evenly and balanced, if those sources universally denigate the person, than evidently that's what those sources do. It's our job to represent them, not to censor them.

Will

**************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut000500000000... )