On 2 Oct 2008 at 14:46, George Herbert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:27 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
Doesn't it seem like there's a bit of a distinction between "we didn't run his line" compared to
"he was called a raving lunatic, a psychopathic hoodlum, and driven from WP on a rail by a group we now know were equally partial and acting in bad faith"
Just a small difference from what you stated, to what actually occurred.
We now know no such thing, William. That's high slander and a gross misinterpretation of the actual facts on the ground.
You're calling that "high slander", while calling Byrne and Bagley all sorts of bad names (which is continuing right here on this list now) is perfectly fine?