In a message dated 4/28/2009 12:50:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time, carcharothwp@googlemail.com writes:
The debate over whether some discussions are better held at a centralised, specialised venue, or on the article talk page, is a long one. There are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches. It would be good to have a discussion here about that.>>
------------------
What I find is that in many cases they do start on the Talk page, and migrate to the RSN based on a few factors.
Firstly the "no one is here" factor. Some pages have very light traffic and it could be months before anyone responds to a comment on say, "Berengaria of Navarre" as to whether "Runciman really is reliable for early Spanish kingdoms?"
Secondly the "I don't like it" factor where either justifiably or not, the source you're trying to bring, or discredit, is discredited or brought, by a strong counter-voice and you want more weight on your side.
Will
************** An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221621499x1201450105/aol?redir=http...; bcd=AprilExcScore428NO62)