Sam Spade wrote:
Thank you for clarifying my thesis: That those who describe others as "troublemakers" (esp. persons such as myself without any serious charges against them, past or present) are incapable of judging them neutrally. You have already made up your mind, evidence be damned. You solidify the bigotry by comparing me to those you have censured before. This Ivory Tower injustice cannot long last. Your prejudices and flippant generalisations underscore your inability to fairly judge better than any argument I could make.
Your post is long on ranting and notably short on evidence.
Please provide diffs illustrating your claim of conflict of interest.
- d.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Nobs01_and_o...
Sam Spade
On 12/6/05, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Sam Spade wrote:
Thank you for clarifying my thesis: That those who describe others as "troublemakers" (esp. persons such as myself without any serious charges against them, past or present) are incapable of judging them neutrally. You have already made up your mind, evidence be damned. You solidify the bigotry by comparing me to those you have censured before. This Ivory Tower injustice cannot long last. Your prejudices and flippant generalisations underscore your inability to fairly judge better than any argument I could make.
Your post is long on ranting and notably short on evidence.
Please provide diffs illustrating your claim of conflict of interest.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Sam Spade wrote:
On 12/6/05, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Sam Spade wrote:
Thank you for clarifying my thesis: That those who describe others as "troublemakers" (esp. persons such as myself without any serious charges against them, past or present) are incapable of judging them neutrally. You have already made up your mind, evidence be damned. You solidify the bigotry by comparing me to those you have censured before. This Ivory Tower injustice cannot long last. Your prejudices and flippant generalisations underscore your inability to fairly judge better than any argument I could make.
Your post is long on ranting and notably short on evidence. Please provide diffs illustrating your claim of conflict of interest.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Nobs01_and_o...
The entire text at the above is:
Sam Spade closing statement
I'll quote a friend and fellow AMA advocate: "When blindness is so strong, there's nothing more to do."
Sam Spade 21:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
You've sent a pile of messages here throwing mud and attempting to blacken Jayjg's character, and when called on it you can produce nothing. Well done.
- d.
Please, don't bother w the false indignation. You have given me no reason to believe you would be swayed by any evidence, no matter how clear. I had begun to waste my time looking into the long history of conflict between Jayjg and I.
After an hour or two of time I should have spent writing my final, I had a few links. Given a few hours more, I would have enough evidence for an impartial jury. Fortunately I got a helpful piece of advice from a fellow members advocate, and I did the right thing, the smart thing. I gave up. Fighting w ''this'' arbcom is merely a tarbaby. No good can come of it.
I'll fight for elections, I'll fight against appointees w no mandate, but I won't continue trying to force you to see the light. Its simply a waste of my valuable time and energy.
Sam Spade
On 12/6/05, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
Sam Spade wrote:
On 12/6/05, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Sam Spade wrote:
Thank you for clarifying my thesis: That those who describe others as "troublemakers" (esp. persons such as myself without any serious charges against them, past or present) are incapable of judging them neutrally. You have already made up your mind, evidence be damned. You solidify the bigotry by comparing me to those you have censured before. This Ivory Tower injustice cannot long last. Your prejudices and flippant generalisations underscore your inability to fairly judge better than any argument I could make.
Your post is long on ranting and notably short on evidence. Please provide diffs illustrating your claim of conflict of interest.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Nobs01_and_o...
The entire text at the above is:
Sam Spade closing statement
I'll quote a friend and fellow AMA advocate: "When blindness is so strong, there's nothing more to do."
Sam Spade 21:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
You've sent a pile of messages here throwing mud and attempting to blacken Jayjg's character, and when called on it you can produce nothing. Well done.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Sam Spade wrote:
Please, don't bother w the false indignation. You have given me no reason to believe you would be swayed by any evidence, no matter how clear. I had begun to waste my time looking into the long history of conflict between Jayjg and I.
Rather than, say, presenting no evidence because you have no evidence that wouldn't be laughed out of the room? So far you've thrown mud and presented nothing to back it up.
- d.
I "threw" evidence regarding Cberlet, what did that result in?
Sam Spade
On 12/7/05, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
Sam Spade wrote:
Please, don't bother w the false indignation. You have given me no reason to believe you would be swayed by any evidence, no matter how clear. I had begun to waste my time looking into the long history of conflict between Jayjg and I.
Rather than, say, presenting no evidence because you have no evidence that wouldn't be laughed out of the room? So far you've thrown mud and presented nothing to back it up.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l