As Mav said, he is at it again, this time at Mugabe, removing any information that can be perceived as a critique.
Danny
As Mav said, he is at it again, this time at Mugabe, removing any information that can be perceived as a critique.
I checked out the Mugabe edits; while they're not as bad as I feared, 172 was clearly confrontational, and his reasoning flawed (he called attributed statements he did not like non-NPOV). Please keep an eye on his edits.
Regards,
Erik