"the concern for the welfare of others, the need to be treated with respect, and the need to be welcomed in a culture - are all things my people share with yours." - Karla McLaren,
I feel that this is the essence of the Unification Movement - which finds itself firmly in both camps: the metaphysical, because Unificationists espouse a belief in God and the afterlife and the skeptical, because Unificationism declares itself as refusing to be tied to "blind faith".
I'm a software engineer, and my boss relies on me to be "skeptical" when testing other people's programs. "Billy said it works? Well, I'll believe that when I see it." Then Billy refuses to believe that it DOESN'T work, unless I can reproduce the error right in front of his eyes - and he still won't be fully convinced until he himself can make it fail.
My personal question is whether any faith can stand the scrutiny of critical thinking. And my answer is yes, but that makes me a rare bird indeed. Even people in my church think I'm a bit kooky for being so hard-headed.
My work at Wikipedia has often involved what McLaren called speaking to people in in their own language: she said, "If we want to successfully communicate with someone, we've got to understand not just their language, but the cultural context from which their language springs.
From what I've seen in both the New Age and the skeptical cultures, this
understanding is absent."
I'm Wikipedia's best Mediator (or have been so far - I have high hopes for RedWolf's new crew) because I'm really good at translating one "language" to another - not German to French of course, but the context of assumptions (or "baggage"). How else could a man in a "cult" gain the trust of a bunch of atheists? Jimbo gave me root access to the server, the Cunctator nominated me for Admin, people are constantly coming to my user talk page asking me to mediate their article disputes - and I don't mean how to format the Simpsons' infobox, I mean the real hard stuff.
Oh, well, I'm just rambling. I didn't have anything in particular to say. Sorry I wasted your time, I just thought David Gerard picked an interesting web link and thought I'd throw out a few comments:
http://www.csicop.org/si/2004-05/new-age.html
Uncle Ed
charles matthews wrote:
Ed Poor wrote
Oh, well, I'm just rambling.
The capacity of the American male to self-promote never ceases to amaze me. (Yep, happens on wiki-en too, amazingly enough.) The 'aw, shucks, there I go talking about myself' that follows induces a sense of awe too.
Somewhere or another, ages ago, I saw a comparison of cultures that characterized the US as a "nation of salespeople", in that USians would seemingly instinctively promote their work, their possessions, themselves, their children, etc. If after hearing the praises of a child, you offered to buy it for a million dollars, a USian parent might be surprised, but then more likely pleased with your interest than insulted at the idea of engaging in human trafficking. 1/2 :-)
Stan
On 10/26/05, Poor, Edmund W Edmund.W.Poor@abc.com wrote:
--snip--
Ok, Mr. Chasm-bridger, let's see you fix the deletion debate, once and for all...
;-)
(Oh no! He's gonna delete AfD again!)
-- Michael Turley User:Unfocused
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Michael Turley wrote:
On 10/26/05, Poor, Edmund W Edmund.W.Poor@abc.com wrote:
--snip--
Ok, Mr. Chasm-bridger, let's see you fix the deletion debate, once and for all...
;-)
(Oh no! He's gonna delete AfD again!)
A better solution would be to ban people who:
- Make unqualified votes - Make unqualified nominations - Sound crazy
on AfD.
(Invert criteria and apply to VfU as appropriate.)
- -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \