In a message dated 4/30/2008 1:19:07 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, delirium@hackish.org writes:

It's particularly damaging if the article looks authoritative---well-written, good formatting, footnotes duly inserted, etc... but highly biased and libelous. On the other hand, a union leader being called "a douchebag" by a random person on the internet, with bad grammar and the offending juvenile insult removed a week later, doesn't suffer particularly great harm>>

-------------------------------------------------- It's much harder to address type A however, than it is to address type B. We can all spot a random "fuck you" in the middle of a discussion of the merits of cucumbers. It's much harder to spot an unfounded bias.

Will

**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)