Anthony DiPierro wrote:

So, since you believe this is *clearly* not fair use, I assume you can point to a number of court rulings, some at a very high level in the appeals process, which cover similar uses which were ruled to not be fair use? I for one would be interested in seeing those cases.

I am not an attorney, however even my meager lay resources are able to identify:

Los Angeles News Service, Robert Tur v. Audio Video Reporting Services et al. Encyclopaedia Britannica v. Crooks Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphics Corporation

There are more. No shortage of bogus fair use claims reaching the courts.

uc