Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On 2/1/06, Sean Barrett <sean at epoptic.org> wrote:
David understates the case, by the way: It is hilarious to watch them arguing over the correct procedure to "get" Tony, when it's obvious that they haven't even begun the process for developing the plan to generate a schedule to outline [[Wikipedia:Requests for Lynching]] ([[WP:RfL]]).
I suspect there would be three schools of thoughts on this:
Could you please both post these messages on WP:ANI.
- d.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
David Gerard stated for the record:
Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On 2/1/06, Sean Barrett <sean at epoptic.org> wrote:
David understates the case, by the way:
I suspect there would be three schools of thoughts on this:
Could you please both post these messages on WP:ANI.
My half is added (at the current bottom) slightly edited to flow better .... Kirill, would you please add your "three schools of thought" as a reply to my comment?
- -- Sean Barrett | Nanotechnology can do *anything*, just sean@epoptic.org | like atomic power could in the 1950s.
On 2/1/06, Sean Barrett sean@epoptic.org wrote:
David Gerard stated for the record:
Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On 2/1/06, Sean Barrett <sean at epoptic.org> wrote:
David understates the case, by the way:
I suspect there would be three schools of thoughts on this:
Could you please both post these messages on WP:ANI.
My half is added (at the current bottom) slightly edited to flow better .... Kirill, would you please add your "three schools of thought" as a reply to my comment?
Done.
Kirill Lokshin
Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On 2/1/06, Sean Barrett sean@epoptic.org wrote:
David Gerard stated for the record:
Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On 2/1/06, Sean Barrett <sean at epoptic.org> wrote:
David understates the case, by the way:
I suspect there would be three schools of thoughts on this:
Could you please both post these messages on WP:ANI.
My half is added (at the current bottom) slightly edited to flow better .... Kirill, would you please add your "three schools of thought" as a reply to my comment?
Done.
Kirill Lokshin
I have blocked both of you for off-site editing coordination.
(that's a joke , in case anyone is wondering)
grm_wnr
Though there is a new proposal [[Wikipedia:Off-site policy discussions considered harmful]] (or something like that) which David and Kirill are in clear breach of!!!! :)
I'm still waiting for [[Wikipedia:Creating or constructively editing articles considered harmful]].
Jon
grm_wnr grmwnr@gmail.com wrote: Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On 2/1/06, Sean Barrett wrote:
David Gerard stated for the record:
Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On 2/1/06, Sean Barrett wrote:
David understates the case, by the way:
I suspect there would be three schools of thoughts on this:
Could you please both post these messages on WP:ANI.
My half is added (at the current bottom) slightly edited to flow better .... Kirill, would you please add your "three schools of thought" as a reply to my comment?
Done.
Kirill Lokshin
I have blocked both of you for off-site editing coordination.
(that's a joke , in case anyone is wondering)
grm_wnr _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------- Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now.
On 2/1/06, grm_wnr grmwnr@gmail.com wrote:
Jon wrote:
I'm still waiting for [[Wikipedia:Creating or constructively editing articles considered harmful]].
Jon
To begin with, it's a major strain on the servers.
grm_wnr.
Strangly no. Due to the way the servers are set up editor traffic doesn't have nearly as much impact on viewing speeds for non editors as you would expect.
-- geni
geni wrote:
On 2/1/06, grm_wnr grmwnr@gmail.com wrote:
To begin with, it's a major strain on the servers.
grm_wnr.
Strangly no. Due to the way the servers are set up editor traffic doesn't have nearly as much impact on viewing speeds for non editors as you would expect.
Perhaps it would be optimal to switch Wikipedia over to _write_-only mode. Get rid of all those freeloading readers who don't contribute. :)
On 2/2/06, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
geni wrote:
On 2/1/06, grm_wnr grmwnr@gmail.com wrote:
To begin with, it's a major strain on the servers.
grm_wnr.
Strangly no. Due to the way the servers are set up editor traffic doesn't have nearly as much impact on viewing speeds for non editors as you would expect.
Perhaps it would be optimal to switch Wikipedia over to _write_-only mode. Get rid of all those freeloading readers who don't contribute. :)
Can't a lot of our servers are not sutible to be database servers. -- geni
On 2/1/06, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
geni wrote:
On 2/1/06, grm_wnr grmwnr@gmail.com wrote:
To begin with, it's a major strain on the servers.
grm_wnr.
Strangly no. Due to the way the servers are set up editor traffic doesn't have nearly as much impact on viewing speeds for non editors as you would expect.
Perhaps it would be optimal to switch Wikipedia over to _write_-only mode. Get rid of all those freeloading readers who don't contribute. :)
Perhaps Wikipedia should have a minimum [[share ratio]]. :-)
-- Mark [[User:Carnildo]]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
grm_wnr stated for the record:
I have blocked both of you for off-site editing coordination.
(that's a joke , in case anyone is wondering)
grm_wnr
Y'know, if [[User:the Epopt]] were blocked, I'd create a sockpuppet and have the time of my life. You'd never catch me, because I'd edit a completely different set of pages. I'd never touch RfAr -- I'd stay away from Crap for Deletion -- I'd even avoid making fun of Process That Is Important -- instead, I'd actually edit articles!
Mmm ... articles ... <Homer Simpson drool>
- -- Sean Barrett | Nanotechnology can do *anything*, just sean@epoptic.org | like atomic power could in the 1950s.
Time to block [[User:The Epopt]] indefinitely then, on the grounds that it is clearly beneficial to the encylopaedia to do so!
Sean Barrett sean@epoptic.org wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
grm_wnr stated for the record:
I have blocked both of you for off-site editing coordination.
(that's a joke , in case anyone is wondering)
grm_wnr
Y'know, if [[User:the Epopt]] were blocked, I'd create a sockpuppet and have the time of my life. You'd never catch me, because I'd edit a completely different set of pages. I'd never touch RfAr -- I'd stay away from Crap for Deletion -- I'd even avoid making fun of Process That Is Important -- instead, I'd actually edit articles!
Mmm ... articles ...
- -- Sean Barrett | Nanotechnology can do *anything*, just sean@epoptic.org | like atomic power could in the 1950s.
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail