Our policies should reflect our supposed commitment to collecting the data.
If the data shows that person X is a cad, then that's not our fault, and we have no moral responsibility to that person. No more than any other journalistic outlet. "Do no harm" is an unusable mantra because it can be used to exclude anything negative or even-suspect from an article.
Perhaps someone can come up with a better "nutshell" of what the BLP policy is really about.
Will Johnson
**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:16 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
Our policies should reflect our supposed commitment to collecting the data.
What commitment to collecting *data*? Wikipedia is supposed to be a free content encyclopedia. A commitment to collecting knowledge you can argue, but Wikipedia as a dump of data has been outright rejected.