So far, just today, he has reverted [[DNA]] (again) to his version of the article and then protected his version without adding {{msg:protected}} or listing it at [[wikipedia:Protected page]]. When I updated the summary at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/168]] to reflect this 168 protected that page and when the protection was lifted by another admin he DELETED the page (10 times so far) and blanked it a couple times.
Please see the summary at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/168 (if it still exists).
I hereby request that 168...'s sysop status be removed and for the matter to go directly to the arbitration committee. Since I am on the arbitration committee and a party to this dispute I will recuse myself.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
Daniel Mayer wrote:
I hereby request that 168...'s sysop status be removed and for the matter to go directly to the arbitration committee. Since I am on the arbitration committee and a party to this dispute I will recuse myself.
I believe as currently constituted the arbitration committee in its "temporary" phase can only accept disputes referred to it by Jimbo, so... does Jimbo wish to refer it?
-Mark
Delirium wrote:
I hereby request that 168...'s sysop status be removed and for the matter to go directly to the arbitration committee. Since I am on the arbitration committee and a party to this dispute I will recuse myself.
I believe as currently constituted the arbitration committee in its "temporary" phase can only accept disputes referred to it by Jimbo, so... does Jimbo wish to refer it?
Yes, I'm willing. If there are other steps that should be taken first, I don't want to short-circuit that, but something needs to be done here.
--Jimbo