Here's why it's a bad idea to ban links to the "attack sites"... then I wouldn't be able to call y'all's attention to stuff like this:
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=8582
The person (with a questionable grasp on reality) from American Biograph and Mutoscope Company is here accusing Wikipedians of hacking his bank account, in addition to calling it "defamatory" that they don't accept on his say-so that his company is the legitimate successor to a company that went defunct back in the 1920s.
On 4/29/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
I like this part...
"but there is no way they can try and prove we are NOT the same company, intimating unless we "Show" these "Editors" our confidential paperwork that shows we are the same company. Pretty slick?"
I've heard this song before.
"The lurkers support me in email"
"I have a list of commies in the State Department (but I can't show them to you)"
"$OPENSOURCEPROJECT contains proprietary code from our software but we can't show you which code because it's proprietary"
Ya'll just have to believe us.
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:25:55 -0400, "Daniel R. Tobias" dan@tobias.name wrote:
The person (with a questionable grasp on reality) from American Biograph and Mutoscope Company is here accusing Wikipedians of hacking his bank account, in addition to calling it "defamatory" that they don't accept on his say-so that his company is the legitimate successor to a company that went defunct back in the 1920s.
That guy is a kook and no mistake.
Guy (JzG)
Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
Here's why it's a bad idea to ban links to the "attack sites"... then I wouldn't be able to call y'all's attention to stuff like this: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=8582 The person (with a questionable grasp on reality) from American Biograph and Mutoscope Company is here accusing Wikipedians of hacking his bank account, in addition to calling it "defamatory" that they don't accept on his say-so that his company is the legitimate successor to a company that went defunct back in the 1920s.
Nice of him to point out that the "filming on the moon" stuff is buried on their website, even if it's not evident at first sight. Our article now links directly to the current site, rather than relying on Internet Archive links ;-)
Cheers, mate!