Photo size and tangential plastering - WikiEN-l

15 Jun 2005


      SlimVirgin has misrepresented the situation. The photo was never larger than 
250px - the same size as the other two photos. If you note on the talk:feces 
page, nobody ever objected to the size of photo. However, I REDUCED the size 
of the photos from 250px to 200px. Me. I did. Just for better layout. And 
the image was not 'plastered all over tangential' articles. It was added to 
defecation and one other. In those cases, other editors simply removed the 
picture, and I deferred to their judgement and did not re-post it. Is this 
vandalism?
Jane
...
I don't feel that including an image of human feces is inappropriate.
Having it huge and then  plastered all over tangentially-related
articles is vandalism, and Eyeon should note that _that_ is a
perfectly valid reason for being blocked.
Sam
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/