Wasn't Wikipedia trademarked? Anyway, technically wikipedias is the correct term to use as all the different language versions are different projects right now.

Mgm

On 3/19/07, Keith Old keithold@gmail.com wrote:

G'day folks

Nature has apparently published an article about Ganfyd which is an online textbook of medicine only edited by doctors. I was alerted by a blog post by the medical library of the University of Utah. It is also interesting that wikipedias is used as a plural which may be an indication that wikipedia is becoming a word for an online editable encyclopedia.

The post reads:

Read the following article about wikipedias, especially about a new medical wikipedia, Gandfyd http://www.ganfyd.org/. Only registered medical practitioners are allowed to edit Ganddyd. In it's "about us" section, it states "Simply put this is an evolving textbook of medicine." http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v13/n3/pdf/nm0307-231.pdf "WikiMedia" *NATURE MEDICINE *VOLUME 13 | NUMBER 3 | MARCH 2007 "Ganfyd, short for 'get a note from your doctor,' accepts contributions only from people with medical credentials. More than 300 doctors have already written some 3,000 articles for Ganfyd."

Regards to all.

Keith Old _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

On 3/20/07, Keith Old keithold@gmail.com wrote:

Read the following article about wikipedias, especially about a new medical wikipedia,

Bizarre. Anyone seen any other usage like that?

Steve