Hi,
I have this question about Wikipedia method. If I see cntent that I know for CERTAIN to be true, but the content does not cite a verifiable source and I also know of none, then should I keep the content or should I remove it? Thank you.
Molu
--------------------------------- How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.
Keep it. Verification can come later. But if someone removes it and makes a fuss, don't put it back in.
Fred
On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Molu Bosu Palit wrote:
Hi,
I have this question about Wikipedia method. If I see cntent that I know for CERTAIN to be true, but the content does not cite a verifiable source and I also know of none, then should I keep the content or should I remove it? Thank you.
Molu
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Molu Bosu Palit wrote: I have this question about Wikipedia method. If I see cntent that I know for CERTAIN to be true, but the content does not cite a verifiable source and I also know of none, then should I keep the content or should I remove it? Thank you.
On 4/9/06, Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote: Keep it. Verification can come later. But if someone removes it and makes a fuss, don't put it back in.
You should remove it if it's critical of a living person, or if it's in some other way objectionable or offensive. Also, when you say you know of no source, if you mean you can't at the moment find one, there's no harm in keeping it until you do. But if you mean you believe no source exists, then you should remove it.
Sarah