Don't fully pretend to understand this, but given there was stuff about a WikiJournal on the list recently, I thought this article might be of use to some of the participants:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/sep/16/last-fm-mendeley-victo...
Surreptitiousness wrote:
Don't fully pretend to understand this, but given there was stuff about a WikiJournal on the list recently, I thought this article might be of use to some of the participants:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/sep/16/last-fm-mendeley-victo...
Concerns [[Mendeley]], and our article is a little clearer, but not much. This service aggregates academic papers in some cloudy sense: but in what sense, exactly?
Charles
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
Surreptitiousness wrote:
Don't fully pretend to understand this, but given there was stuff about a WikiJournal on the list recently, I thought this article might be of use to some of the participants:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/sep/16/last-fm-mendeley-victo...
Concerns [[Mendeley]], and our article is a little clearer, but not much. This service aggregates academic papers in some cloudy sense: but in what sense, exactly?
I think it is this bit:
"You can recommend other people's papers and see how many people are reading yours, which you can't do in Nature and Science"
Carcharoth