Pity. If they had a compatible license, $10m of investment using free content could get somewhere useful. And producing free content. -- Justin Cormack
Reply to a query of how the non-subscription material on DU will be licenced:
It will be some form of creative commons license. We are still mulling over various possible versions, -- Bernard Haisch
-- User:Jeandré
On 24 Dec 2005, at 11:05, Jack wrote:
Pity. If they had a compatible license, $10m of investment using free content could get somewhere useful. And producing free content. -- Justin Cormack
Reply to a query of how the non-subscription material on DU will be licenced:
It will be some form of creative commons license. We are still mulling over various possible versions, -- Bernard Haisch
Hmmm, so its going to be free but incompatible with wikipedia. Apparently.
Compatible with Commons though.
Justinc
On 12/25/05, Justin Cormack justin@specialbusservice.com wrote:
It will be some form of creative commons license. We are still mulling over various possible versions, -- Bernard Haisch
Hmmm, so its going to be free but incompatible with wikipedia. Apparently.
If it is a -nc CC license, I would not consider it free...
Mathias
On 12/25/05, Justin Cormack justin@specialbusservice.com wrote:
On 24 Dec 2005, at 11:05, Jack wrote:
Pity. If they had a compatible license, $10m of investment using free content could get somewhere useful. And producing free content. -- Justin Cormack
Reply to a query of how the non-subscription material on DU will be licenced:
It will be some form of creative commons license. We are still mulling over various possible versions, -- Bernard Haisch
Hmmm, so its going to be free but incompatible with wikipedia. Apparently.
Compatible with Commons though.
Justinc
There may be developments on that front comeing up.
-- geni