This is getting ridiculous. This issue has now generated close to 60 messages. I urge Blair, his detractors and everyone else to stop this discussion. It is a clash between an admin and the 3RR policy, which should be discussed on the wiki and not here. Am I the only one who feels that the 3RR is making life harder for admins?
Jfdwolff
____________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned by the StreamShield Protector antivirus system.
Doctors.net.uk is used by over 111,000 UK doctors.
____________________________________________________________
jfdwolff@doctors.org.uk wrote:
This is getting ridiculous. This issue has now generated close to 60 messages. I urge Blair, his detractors and everyone else to stop this discussion. It is a clash between an admin and the 3RR policy, which should be discussed on the wiki and not here. Am I the only one who feels that the 3RR is making life harder for admins?
Perhaps it will do to repeat my previous suggestion. There should be a separate mailing list for disciplinary issues. I can even state now that I will not subscribe to it.
Ec
From: jfdwolff@doctors.org.uk This is getting ridiculous. This issue has now generated close to 60 messages. I urge Blair, his detractors and everyone else to stop this discussion. It is a clash between an admin and the 3RR policy, which should be discussed on the wiki and not here.
Amen.
Am I the only one who feels that the 3RR is making life harder for admins?
I'm sure you're not the only one, but I feel quite the opposite. More importantly, I think it's made it less likely for regular (i.e. non edit-warrior) editors to be scared away from Wikipedia.
Jay.
JAY JG wrote:
From: jfdwolff@doctors.org.uk
It is a clash between an admin and the 3RR policy, which should be discussed on the wiki and not here.
Amen.
For the record, I agree, and if the process hadn't locked me totally out of the wiki, that's exactly where it'd be.
--Blair