On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm, how long do we reckon their identities will
remain private? 3
days? A week, tops?
Steve
Not to mention the private information they wish to suppress. The fact
that this confidential information, which they do not want disclosed,
refers to a mother and her child suggests certain categories of
possible facts.
The order makes it clear that there is two parts to the information
suppressed: first, that there is some allegation of impropriety with
an expense account and second, that there is sensitive information
that relates to the child and that the father (or husband) is not a
party to the case. I'm sure someone on Wikipedia Review will do the
relevant digging and publish the whole story in short order.
Nathan