Now... this is just...
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Nick_Berg&oldid=3551741
Okay, it shows a human face, on which we can put a name, a story. This is not an anonymous blurred penis. I also wonder how the family of this man will appreciate that we display this picture. I think we reach the limit of dignity here. I also think (for those who might not be sensible to the dignity argument) that such a display might be more hurtful than beneficial on Wikipedia image.
Now, I understand that some people want this picture on Wikipedia very much. I did not censor it by deleting it. So, it is no use screaming censorship.
I did an online link to this picture, so it is available, but only to those who wish to see it. Not to everyone.
I know not how much votes would be in favor of visibly displaying that picture on Wikipedia. I consider it really is a candidate for an image hidden behind a link.
I just went to take a look at this page and discovered that it was protected by Svertigo a couple hours ago. There was no mention of why on the Talk page nor on [[Wikipedia:Protected_page#Pages_protected_due_to_edit_wars_or_vandalism]] and a quick look at the Page history didn't reveal an edit war so I unprotected it, but Svertigo reprotected it. What the hell is going on?
V.
Easy. Reddi put the severed head on the current event page Someone removed it Then he put it on the Nick page. I removed it He put it back I removed the picture, but put a link to the picture in the article he removed it and put back the picture I reverted he reverted I reverted .......
Viajero a écrit:
I just went to take a look at this page and discovered that it was protected by Svertigo a couple hours ago. There was no mention of why on the Talk page nor on [[Wikipedia:Protected_page#Pages_protected_due_to_edit_wars_or_vandalism]] and a quick look at the Page history didn't reveal an edit war so I unprotected it, but Svertigo reprotected it. What the hell is going on?
V.