Slate's link. John's question, it turns out, was legitimate.
Fred
-----Original Message----- From: Steve Summit [mailto:scs@eskimo.com] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 11:04 AM To: wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Is Slate an attack site?
Fred Bauder wrote:
The problem is that the link to the speculations about SlimVirgin, seem simply added as an afterthought. Kinda of like spitting in soup right before you serve it. The link really doesn't add anything to the discussion about Google. I think the information could be found in a source that is not spoiled in that way.
Are you talking about Johnleemk's link to the Slate piece, or the Slate piece's link to Brandt's WR piece?
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On 11/10/2007, fredbaud@waterwiki.info fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
John's question, it turns out, was legitimate.
"...it turns out".
I love that the *default assumption* has become that someone raising a question about the attack-sites concept is being frivolous (or worse)... didn't this project use to have some kind of thing about assuming good faith?
On 10/11/07, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
I love that the *default assumption* has become that someone raising a question about the attack-sites concept is being frivolous (or worse)... didn't this project use to have some kind of thing about assuming good faith?
I've been following this mailing list for a couple of months now, and it seems that WP:AGF doesn't apply here.
--Darkwind