Someone please tell me how this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_Naval_Base
is better off not being broken up into separate entries.
The Cunctator wrote:
Someone please tell me how this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_Naval_Base
is better off not being broken up into separate entries.
I count four sections that are already broken off into separate entries:
[[Camp Delta]] [[Camp Iguana]]/ /[[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]] [[Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee Against Torture]]
It looks like it could use more, though. Is anyone trying to stop you from doing it? I don't see anything obvious in the history or talk pages discussing this issue.
On 3/15/06, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
The Cunctator wrote:
Someone please tell me how this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_Naval_Base
is better off not being broken up into separate entries.
I count four sections that are already broken off into separate entries:
[[Camp Delta]] [[Camp Iguana]]/ /[[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]] [[Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee Against Torture]]
It looks like it could use more, though. Is anyone trying to stop you from doing it? I don't see anything obvious in the history or talk pages discussing this issue.
No, I'm just whining. If the Naval Base section was broken off from the detention camp section i'd have less to complain about.
On 3/15/06, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/15/06, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
The Cunctator wrote:
Someone please tell me how this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_Naval_Base
is better off not being broken up into separate entries.
I count four sections that are already broken off into separate entries:
[[Camp Delta]] [[Camp Iguana]]/ /[[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]] [[Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee Against Torture]]
It looks like it could use more, though. Is anyone trying to stop you from doing it? I don't see anything obvious in the history or talk pages discussing this issue.
No, I'm just whining. If the Naval Base section was broken off from the detention camp section i'd have less to complain about.
Okay, I did a bit but there's still tons that needs to be broken off and better organized.
The Cunctator wrote:
Someone please tell me how this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_Naval_Base
is better off not being broken up into separate entries.
Wow, it's sure grown since I looked at it last. I think it's ready to be its own project now - gitmo.wikimedia.org, complete with full bios of all the prisoners and all the guards, and entries like [[15 March 2006 at Gitmo]] to record the events of each day (only the *notable* events of course).
Stan
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:12:27 -0500, you wrote:
Someone please tell me how this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_Naval_Base is better off not being broken up into separate entries.
See that "Edit" button? ... :-) Guy (JzG)