Steve, news articles *in general* are primary sources.
Here is how you can tell: Is what I'm reading the first time someone has published what I'm reading?
"So and so was hit by a car today" -- primary source, first time published.
Secondary sources collate multiple primary sources, any multiple primary sources. When a source uses some primary and some secondary sources, I personally would still call that secondary. "Marion Davies claimed in tape interviews that she was born in 1905, but a search of relevant public records indicates she was born in 1897".
HOWEVER, when we had the discussion years ago about what a "tertiary" source should be in Wiki-speak, we almost always only referred to encyclopedias and their ilk, which collate multiple secondary sources. It's hard to come up with another example of what a tertiary source would be, and I personally don't like the term, but there you go.
Will Johnson
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:13 AM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
Steve, news articles *in general* are primary sources.
Here is how you can tell: Is what I'm reading the first time someone has published what I'm reading?
"So and so was hit by a car today" -- primary source, first time published.
Oh, for some reason I thought primary source meant the subject themself had published it. Like a blog, autobiography, etc. I was just confused.
Steve