---- Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
============= On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:09:42 +0100, "Andrew Gray" shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
Pause for a second. Imagine you're entirely unfamiliar with Wikipedia. You see some horrible crap. You figure out you can edit. What do you do? You delete it.
The whole article? *All* of it? Even the bits which are not crap? No I don't.
Guy (JzG)
================================
The first, second, ..... time they remove the crap. When it keeps getting inserted they blank the whole article.
Sydney
Sydney aka FloNight wrote:
---- Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote: The whole article? *All* of it? Even the bits which are not crap? No I don't.
Guy (JzG)
================================
The first, second, ..... time they remove the crap. When it keeps getting inserted they blank the whole article.
You are making things up out of thin air. Here are the contributions of the article-blanker:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=A...
Just two edits, both of those were wholesale removals of the entire article.
The edit that added the objectionable material was on October 11: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judy_Genshaft&diff=80888561&am... That material wasn't touched until Aarcelay blanked the article. Nobody at any point tried removing _just_ the objectionable bit.