I did reinsert those words, but I also made other substantive edits. This has nothing to do w reversion. If I had reinserted thoise terms, and made other, non-substantive edits, i could understand, but thats not the case here. I went way out of my way to obey the policy, and have been blocked. I insist this is a violation of proper blocking procedure.
Jack
_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:49:04 -0500 (EST), Jack Lynch jacklynch@excite.com wrote:
I did reinsert those words, but I also made other substantive edits. This has nothing to do w reversion. If I had reinserted thoise terms, and made other, non-substantive edits, i could understand, but thats not the case here. I went way out of my way to obey the policy, and have been blocked. I insist this is a violation of proper blocking procedure.
Hmm I'm not sure. Did you not think that you might be blocked for doing this? It looks to me as if you were trying to sneak a revert of the words into the edits. What I am saying is that you appear not to be editing in good faith. Since it was clear that the god --> God etcs were likely to be contentious, why didn't you make the substantive edits without them? then you could have gone back tomorrow and tried again or whatever?
Theresa