On 10/6/05, actionforum(a)comcast.net <actionforum(a)comcast.net> wrote:
Regardless of the fact that some oppose the 3RR rule, when the prescribed
punishment is a 24 hour block, putting someone in a system that almost
certainly will result in a longer block without careful monitoring and
intervention by the admin is abusive.
Oh this is surely an incredibly nitpicking attitude. If the block lasts a
bit longer than you expected, you can go and read a book or a newspaper or
something. Why the tearing hurry to get back to the wiki? The block is there
to tell you to cool it.
You seem to be straining so very hard to find admin actions abusive, that
you don't consider that the admin actions serve a useful purpose. That
purpose is not to measure out time in equal portions, as an egg-timer might
do, but to keep people who have been making abusive edits away from the
wiki. . Were it not for the editor's eagerness to tear back into the wiki
and perform yet another useless revert, he wouldn't have been blocked in the
first place.