Hello,
My user name is 'Brian Brockmeyer' and my IP address is 66.254.232.219.
I am writing because I have been the victim of an unfair block by Phroziac over edits relating to the University of Miami article page.
User:Arigold reported me on the Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/3RR for alleged violation of the 3-revert rule, which was not the case. Phroziac, who handled Arigold's complaint, readily acknowledged that there had been no 3RR violation, writing:
"Maybe I'm blind, but i don't see any four reverts from him that fall into a 24 hour period. However, that is gaming the system, and I have blocked him for 24 hours. In the future, please sign posts on pages like this with ~~~~ --Phroziac (talk) 15:20, 15 September 2005 (UTC)"
By Phroziac's own admission, I did not violate the 3RR, yet he proceeded to block me anyway with no basis in Wiki's Blocking Policy.
His claim that I was "gaming the system" amounts to nothing more than an affirmation that I did NOT violate the 3RR. Even still, it lacks all merit, since there were merely 4 reverts in a 5 day span (19:36 September 9 to 19:54 September 14, the date of my last reversion that precipitated Phroziac's block), which hardly evinces any kind of intent to manipulate and exploit the 3RR. The 3RR prohibits 3 reverts within a 24-hour window. I made 4 in 100+ (interestingly enough, the same # as AriGold, who was NOT blocked). Neither the 3RR was violated, nor its spirit, was violated. Not even close. That a block was issued is an eggregious abuse of administrative power on the part of Phroziac.
Furthermore, even after being blocked in violation of Wiki's Blocking Policy, Phroziac failed to follow the suggested procedures for informing a blocked user in the Policy, specifically: "It is helpful to leave a notice of the block, with links to the differences that demonstrate the violation, on the user's talk page."
No such notice was ever rendered on my talk page. I did not learn that I had been blocked until I attempted to make edit. The reason is quite obvious: Phroziac did not have any grounds for invoking a block that he could point to on my talk page--he knew he could not demonstrate any violation, so he neglected to provide notice altogether.
In sum, I request that the block be lifted and that Phroziac be made aware of proper Wiki Blocking Policy.
Thank you for your attention,
Brian Brockmeyer
_________________________________________________________________ Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
It seems the alleged "violation of policy" involved blocking you for repeatedly and unexplainedly removing a piece of information from the article without anywhere questioning its accuracy. You simply unilaterally removed it, over and over again.
In this case, I invoke the ultimate policy on unblocking: You've got to find an admin willing to removec it. This one won't.
-FCYTravis@en.wikipedia
On 9/15/05 7:28 PM, "Brian Brockmeyer" brianbrockmeyer@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My user name is 'Brian Brockmeyer' and my IP address is 66.254.232.219.<sz
Brian Brockmeyer wrote:
User:Arigold reported me on the Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/3RR for alleged violation of the 3-revert rule, which was not the case. Phroziac, who handled Arigold's complaint, readily acknowledged that there had been no 3RR violation, writing:
"Maybe I'm blind, but i don't see any four reverts from him that fall into a 24 hour period. However, that is gaming the system, and I have blocked him for 24 hours. In the future, please sign posts on pages like this with ~~~~ --Phroziac (talk) 15:20, 15 September 2005 (UTC)"
By Phroziac's own admission, I did not violate the 3RR, yet he proceeded to block me anyway with no basis in Wiki's Blocking Policy.
His claim that I was "gaming the system" amounts to nothing more than an affirmation that I did NOT violate the 3RR. Even still, it lacks all merit, since there were merely 4 reverts in a 5 day span (19:36 September 9 to 19:54 September 14, the date of my last reversion that precipitated Phroziac's block), which hardly evinces any kind of intent to manipulate and exploit the 3RR. The 3RR prohibits 3 reverts within a 24-hour window. I made 4 in 100+ (interestingly enough, the same # as AriGold, who was NOT blocked). Neither the 3RR was violated, nor its spirit, was violated. Not even close.
Actually, it was. You continued to revert without discussing why you were doing so on the article's talk page, or the talk page of the other editor who was reverting you. /That/ is why we have the 3RR.