On 22 Dec 2005 at 19:18, Mathias Schindler neubau@presroi.de wrote:
on http://fftw.org/~stevenj/Nature-reviews.doc, there is now a Microsoft Word document describing the "errors" (in a broader sense) found by the reviewing persons.
Yuck... proprietary Microsoft formats suck. Why couldn't this have been done in a more standard, less proprietary form like ASCII or HTML?