Definitely not, in our case. Nonprofit educational purposes are a standard
fair use of copyrighted material. Wikipedia has no control over downstream
commercial uses. That's why we can't accept any of the Creative Commons NC
licenses, and similar reasoning applies here. Beware the distinction
between generous republication permission of copyrighted and actual
relicensure: republication permission is revocable; relicensure isn't.
So, sadly, a lot of things we'd really like to use have to be quoted in
small bits or uploaded with nonfree media use rationales, or else passed up
entirely.
-Durova
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Elias Friedman <elipongo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Stephanie Clarkson
<
thespian(a)sleepingcat.com> wrote:
I have been looking over a number of items having
to do with educational
methods. There are a few items that I think would benefit from
illustrations of the methodologies, and I've found some examples,
labelled with 'materials may be reproduced for educational purposes.'
They are the sort of thing where in the course of a 10 page lesson plan,
there's one page for photocopying for distribution, where they have
relinquished some rights (but nothing clear like a CC license).
Does an encylopedia count as an educational purpose (or, I should say,
for a declaration like that, does Wikipedia count in the eyes of the law
as educational)?
S.
I'd say very likely yes. However we have our own rules and licensing.
Except
for the limited exception for fair use images, Wikipedia content has to be
freely re-usable by anyone for anything regardless of whether it's
educational or commercial.
Elias Friedman A.S., EMT-P ⚕
אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי
elipongo(a)gmail.com
http://elipongo.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l