Mr. Wales, I do not understand why you are so upset. I asked you if you intended to use wikipedia as a revenue stream, and you indicate that you are intending to do just that. Where is the offense, please? That I suggest you want the information in wikipedia to be popular even where it is inaccurate? I'm sorry, I just am trying to make sense of your position here.
Why do you find it insulting that I suggested I was barred from posting to a list that I was told was unmoderated when my posts came back "waiting for moderation"? I'm sorry if I don't understand the process by which these moderations occur, I tried every fix that was explained to me, and in each case I was prevented from freely posting until today.
Codie Vickers
--On Thursday, February 26, 2004 9:04 PM +0000 Plautus Satire plautus@shaw.ca wrote:
Mr. Wales, I do not understand why you are so upset. I asked you if you intended to use wikipedia as a revenue stream, and you indicate that you are intending to do just that. Where is the offense, please? That I suggest you want the information in wikipedia to be popular even where it is inaccurate? I'm sorry, I just am trying to make sense of your position here.
The subject line of this post is enough to mark you as a troll in my personal opinion. Note that that is not my opinion as a sysop, nor am I speaking for anyone except myself as a 21 year old college senior.
Nathan
Nathan Russell wrote:
--On Thursday, February 26, 2004 9:04 PM +0000 Plautus Satire plautus@shaw.ca wrote:
Mr. Wales, I do not understand why you are so upset. I asked you if you intended to use wikipedia as a revenue stream, and you indicate that you are intending to do just that. Where is the offense, please? That I suggest you want the information in wikipedia to be popular even where it is inaccurate? I'm sorry, I just am trying to make sense of your position here.
The subject line of this post is enough to mark you as a troll in my personal opinion. Note that that is not my opinion as a sysop, nor am I speaking for anyone except myself as a 21 year old college senior.
This post was quickly followed by another that claimed it was a typo. Since the "u" and "i" are beside each other on the keyboard, it is a perfectly understandable one.
Ec