That's a very fine hair you're trying to split here. To justify the actions of one person, while vilifying the actions of another, even though they did, exactly the same thing. No matter how thinly the hair is split, it is the *intent* of the person which matters isn't it?
And we are all old enough to understand that "intent" can be viewed in a hundred different ways depending on who you're trying to attack :)
**************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and calculators. (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)
2008/9/26 WJhonson@aol.com:
That's a very fine hair you're trying to split here. To justify the actions of one person, while vilifying the actions of another, even though they did, exactly the same thing. No matter how thinly the hair is split, it is the *intent* of the person which matters isn't it?
And we are all old enough to understand that "intent" can be viewed in a hundred different ways depending on who you're trying to attack :)
Is this email in reply to me? Please quote emails when replying to them otherwise it is almost impossible to follow a thread. Thank you.